The Letter
The climate cult leaders recently flew in their private planes to Egypt to meet and discuss the level of prosperity and human flourishing they will permit (1) western industrial society residents to have.
This was a conference (COP 27) that condemned prosperity for creating unimaginable climate horrors due to slight warming caused by fossil fuels and carbon dioxide emissions. For being prosperous, improving food supply and creating innovations for improving human lives which extend across much, but not all, of the world’s population, never ending climate reparations (2)(3)(4) shall be being imposed on US and other western countries citizens
The conference banner should say
Prosperity is bad.
Being cold, poor and hungry is good.
COP-27: A Window Into How The UN Keeps The Poor Poor (5)
Even as we give thanks today for the wonderful benefits of a freedom-based political and economic system, the UN’s big annual “climate” conference, this year going by the moniker COP-27, has only recently wound up. As with most everything the UN does, there was nothing in this conference for anyone to be thankful for.
This year, with the activists’ beloved wind and solar energy sources manifestly failing to solve Europe’s energy crisis, there was little prospect for any major new agreements to limit CO2 emissions. And thus there was far less media coverage than of past such conferences.
But we should not let the event pass without noting the extent to which this conference, like most of what the UN does, evidences the alliance between elite rich-country activists and corrupt developing-country interests, all to keep the poor poor.
Now, you might ask, why would anyone want to keep the poor poor? The world continues to have at least a billion or more people who live in grinding poverty, without basic things like safe water, sanitation, home heat, or electricity. A plurality of those people live on the continent of Africa, with a population of about 1.4 billion, some 500 million of whom live in “extreme poverty” according to the definition and data of the UN itself. Surely, every moral person would want to find a way for those poor people to exit poverty and move up to at least what we consider a middle class lifestyle.
But of course, that is not the case. In the wealthy countries, the elites find themselves hypnotized by the pagan climate cult, with the fundamental belief that use of hydrocarbon fuels is the ultimate mortal sin. These people might mouth platitudes about wanting to help the poor to exit poverty, but at the same time they have no practical idea where their own prosperity comes from, or that it completely depends on abundant energy from fossil fuels. Meanwhile, they are only too willing to use their influence to prevent the poor from using fossil fuels, in the absence of any functional alternative, thus leaving the poor to languish in poverty.
And how about the people that govern the developing countries? You might think that they would badly want to help their people to exit from poverty, but most often that is not in fact the case. Consider developing countries’ policies as to the use of fossil fuels. Their posture on the issue is not completely uniform, and some countries that have abundant fossil fuel reserves, particularly if controlled by the government, are ready to push to develop those resources. However, many other countries go willingly along with the Western pressure for no development of fossil fuels. It’s simple. If you allow exploration and development of these resources, you risk the rise of wealthy local rivals for your power. Much better to accept handouts from the rich countries, which you can package as “climate reparations,” and then use for palace guards and secret police to cement yourself in power. Or maybe just put the money straight into your Swiss bank account. Meanwhile, you can mouth some empty words about “saving the planet,” and probably get yourself fawning attention from the liberal Western press, if not a Nobel Peace Prize.
And the UN? Its institutional interest is to be the intermediary in the massive wealth transfer from the rich to poor countries. The more wealth is transferred, the more need for UN staff and bureaucracy to administer the process. And God forbid that the poor countries should get rich and not need the wealth transfers any more. What then would be left for the UN to do?
References
(1) https://www.njspotlightnews.org/video/international-climate-conference-ends-with-deal-to-fund-vulnerable-nations/
(2) https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/11/21/cop27-is-a-down-payment-on-disaster/
(3) https://www.zerohedge.com/political/us-pledges-climate-reparations-other-countries-while-americans-freeze-and-become-homeless
(5) https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2022-11-24-cop-27-a-window-into-how-the-un-keeps-the-poor-poor
