Why Did VanDrew Give Biden & Pelosi “Monumental” Win?
Why did our Republican Congressman Jeff Van Drew ruin what had been a good week for conservatives and Republicans?
Last Tuesday, Republicans defeated “woke” Democrats in Virginia. They won elections for Governor, Lieutenant Gov., and State Attorney General. Although Jack Ciattarelli narrowly lost his election to Phil Murphy, Republicans did much better than expected, and made gains throughout the state.
Meanwhile, Democrats were in complete disarray. President Biden’s two massive spending bills were stalled. The “Squad” of radical leftists in the House led by Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez refused to vote for the $1.2 trillion dollar “Infrastructure” because they wanted even more radical measures in a second $3.5 trillion “reconciliation” spending bill. As a result, Nancy Pelosi could not get the 218 votes to pass the first spending bill.
At the same time, West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin and Arizona Democratic Senator Kyrsten Sinema both said they would not consider voting the second $3.5 trillion spending bill unless the $1.2 trillion spending bill was passed.
Until Van Drew and 12 other Republican House Members bailed them out, Democrats were divided, depressed, and angry. One frustrated staffer for House Democrats posted the above meme last week before the Republican defections became known.
For more than a week, the Democrats were deadlocked. Each group blamed the other for being selfish and out-of-touch. When Democrats did much worse than expected in last week’s election, they blamed each other for the defeat.
Even more important, new polls suggested that most Americans opposed both massive spending and borrowing measures. That caused many moderate Democrats in both the House and Senate to openly doubt the wisdom of both measures. Members of Congress in both parties openly complained that they had no idea what was in both spending bills. They demanded more documents and time to get details. Many Americans, including Democrats, questioned the leadership of President Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
It appeared that Republicans were strong and united after their good showings in Virginia and New Jersey, and that Democrats were weak and ineffective. Last week, Republican House Minority Leader Keven McCarthy assured top GOP donors that Republican House members would hold firm and would not bail out Democrats Biden and Pelosi with Republican votes to pass their legislation.
At the same time, staffers for our Congressman Jeff Van Drew were making final plans for a major fundraiser with Ohio Republican Congressman Jim Jordan, a founder of the conservative Freedom Caucus at the Italian Gourmet Restaurant in Galloway Township. I had a reservation, and had a check written for a major donation.
All that changed last Thursday afternoon. @AndrewSolender, the Axios reporter for Capitol Hill reported that six Republican members of Congress had agreed to vote with Democrats for the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill. Solender listed those six Republicans as:
- Van Drew
Events then moved rapidly. Knowing she now had six Republicans to make up for the 6 “Squad” Democrats voting “No”, Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the House into session Friday morning to vote on the measure.
Van Drew’s staff quickly notified supporters that Van Drew would not appear at the Galloway fundraiser at 5:30 pm that day. They said Nancy Pelosi had called the House back in session, but did not explain why.
Once it was known that Van Drew and five other Republicans had given Pelosi the votes vote she needed, seven other Republican House members announced that they would also vote “Yes”. That gave Pelosi 13 Republican votes.
There are 221 Democrats and 213 Republicans in the House of Representatives. The “Infrastructure” bill was approved 228 “Yes” to 206 “No”. 215 Democrats and 13 Republicans voted “Yes”. 200 Republicans and 6 Democrats voted “No”.
President Joe Biden, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and most Democrats were ecstatic. Even the “Squad” of Alexander Ocasio-Cortez came out ahead. They enjoyed the benefits of all the radical left measures they negotiated into the bill, even when they voted “No” saying they wanted more! If they didn’t vote for the bill, why didn’t Republicans insist that their radical left measures be taken out?
Before the vote, Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy urged all Republicans to vote against the $1.2 trillion “Infrastructure” bill. If the bill is so good, why didn’t Jeff Van Drew and the other 12 who voted with them publicly say so and publicly urge all 213 Republicans to vote “Yes”?
Why didn’t a single “moderate” Democrat vote with 200 Republicans against the bill. Why did 13 “moderate” Republicans think it was OK to vote for it?
Here is why I think the “Infrastructure” Bill is bad for Republicans and bad for America.
- It spends money for the next ten years. This is so Democrats can guarantee money for all their pet projects even if they lose their majority in next year’s election. It makes elections almost meaningless for the next ten years.
- The Congressional Budget Office, run by Democrats, claims that this will add “only” $256 billion in deficits during the next 10 years. However, many classic financial gimmicks are in the bill, so nobody knows what the real cost will be. At one time, few people cared. However, now people see that when the government pays for things with dollars backed by nothing, prices go up for everyone. The rich are OK, the poor and illegals get government help. Self-reliant middle class working people are hurt the most.
- $110 billion (less than 10%) of the $1.2 trillion will be spent on real “infrastructure”, that is roads and bridges. We already collect enough money from gas taxes and tolls. If costs were under control, we would not need this massive 10 year “infrastructure” spending bill to pay for them. Of course, highway and bridge construction costs are out of control and unsustainable. A few years ago, we spent $500 million to replace two old bridges on the 2.8 mile causeway between Ocean City and Somers Point, New Jersey. We spent $5 million to install traffic lights and remove one traffic circle by the Atlantic City Airport. Why? Because enormous amounts of money are wasted on environmental laws that do nothing to protect the environment, diversity set-asides, and “prevailing wage” union rules that don’t prevail anywhere except for government contracts. Also, because these laws and rules are so complicated, only a handful of expensive, politically connected contractors bid on these jobs.
- $73 billion is for “electric grid and power structure”. Because no new nuclear, gas, coal, or oil power plants are permitted, only new solar panels and wind turbines will be built. That is because solar and wind are so weak, intermittent, and unreliable that duplicate power lines are needed so fossil fuel generators can power the grid when sun isn’t shining and wind not blowing. Otherwise, what we pay on our electric bills would be more than enough to build and fix the power lines we need. The bill will also pay for electric cars, buses and charging stations. This will make even more people dependent on getting electric power that may not be there when needed.
- $105 billion are for trains, buses and subways that few people use. That is because they often are dirty, unsafe, and offer poor service. Many are run by mismanaged political agencies like New Jersey Transit. If private companies like those that run our airlines ran mass transit, we would have better service and lower prices without billions from a broke federal government.
- $55 billion for “water infrastructure”. That means that people who live in towns with well-managed, public or private water companies have to also pay for mismanaged utility companies in Democrat run towns.
- $65 billion for “free” internet controlled by Democrats in mostly Democrat run areas. This is yet another way for Democrats to control politics and elections by controlling news and other information, and shutting out the views of political opponents.
- $21 billion for “environmental remediation”. We have had strict environmental laws since the 1970s. We already spent billions on cleanups, and forced polluting companies to spend billions more to clean up their properties. Exactly what still needs to be “remediated”? Or is this about bailing out politically connected owners of worthless real estate?
- $47 billion for flooding and coastal resiliency as well as “climate resiliency”. Also protections against fires, etc. Sea levels have been rising and falling for billions of years. Instead of spending billions for “resiliency”, why not let those who build too close to the water pay to move if water levels rise. With regard to fires, environmental scientist Michael Shellenberger explained how proper forest and brush management prevents most brush and forest fires from spreading to built up areas.
- $42 billion for airports and dock facilities. Why not let the airlines and shipping companies who use them pay for what they need?
- Critical Race Theory for highways? Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg states that part of the $110 billion earmarked for roads and bridges must be used to “fix the racism built into some of our highways”. The “social justice” term “equity” is stated at least 64 times. This is designed to make sure that a disproportionate share of the money will be benefit Democrat controls companies and towns.
Did Congressman Jeff Van Drew and the other 12 Republicans who voted with him make conservatives and Republicans stronger or weaker by helping Democrats pass this bill?
Chuck Todd, host of NBC News “Meet The Press” today described passage of Biden’s Infrastructure Bill as “one of his best days in office”. Why did our Republican Congressman Jeff Van Drew do this for him?
What would have happened if they voted no? Would Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and her 6 member “Squad” have ended up voting for the bill? If so wouldn’t that have made Democrats weaker? If the “Squad” succeeded in adding more radical left-wing measures, would that have forced moderate Democrats to break ranks?
Would this dissention by Democrats have made Biden and Pelosi Democrats easier to defeat next year? By voting with Democrats, did Van Drew and the other 12 Republicans made Democrats stronger and Republicans weaker?
How should we respond to this? How would you respond?
We are a group of roughly 200 citizens who mostly live near Atlantic City, New Jersey. We volunteer our time and money to maintain this website. We do our best to post accurate information. However, we admit we make mistakes from time to time. If you see any mistakes or inaccurate, misleading, outdated, or incomplete information in this or any of our posts, please let us know. We will do our best to correct the problem as soon as possible. Please email us at email@example.com or telephone (609) 927-7333.
Also, because Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms falsely claim our posts violate their “community standards”, they greatly restrict, “throttle back” or “shadow ban” our posts. Please help us overcome that by sharing our posts wherever you can, as often as you can. Please click the social share links below. Also copy and paste the link to the “comments” section of your favorite sites like Patch.com or PressofAtlanticCity.com and email them to your friends. Finally, please subscribe to our almost weekly email updates on this website, or by emailing us. Thanks.
Seth Grossman, Executive Director